Cmp/3722/2020 Of Mahaveerchand Jain v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
20 Feb 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/3722/2020 Of Mahaveerchand Jain v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
20 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Cmp/3722/2020 Of Mahaveerchand Jain v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
C.M.P.Nos.3722, 3733, 3727, 3726, 3729, 3731, 3730 & 3734 of 2020in
T.C.A.Nos.SR78814, SR78802, SR78816, SR78812, SR78808,SR78810, SR78804 & SR78806 of 2014
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.and
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
(Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN,J.)
These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 1732 days
in representing the above appeals.
2.Heard the parties. This Court is convinced with the reasons stated
in the respective affidavits filed in support of the respective petitions to
condone the delay of 1732 days in representing the above appeals and
accordingly, these petitions are ordered.
ay
(N.K.K.,J.) (P.V.,J.)
20.02.2020
Note:Registry is directed to number the appeals if they are otherwise in order and post for
admission.
http://www.judis.nic.in
C.M.P.Nos.3722, 3733, 3727, 3726, 3729, 3731, 3730 & 3734 of 2020
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.andP.VELMURUGAN, J.ayC.M.P.Nos.3722, 3733, 3727, 3726,3729, 3731, 3730 & 3734 of 2020inT.C.A.Nos.SR78814,SR78802, SR78816, SR78812,SR78808, SR78810, SR78804 & SR78806 of 2014
C.M.P.Nos.3722, 3733, 3727, 3726, 3729, 3731, 3730 & 3734 of 2020
Dated:20.02.2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.