Case LawHigh Court › Cmp/3722/2020 Of Mahaveerchand Jain v. T...

Cmp/3722/2020 Of Mahaveerchand Jain v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 20 Feb 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/3722/2020 Of Mahaveerchand Jain v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
20 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Cmp/3722/2020 Of Mahaveerchand Jain v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

C.M.P.Nos.3722, 3733, 3727, 3726, 3729, 3731, 3730 & 3734 of 2020in T.C.A.Nos.SR78814, SR78802, SR78816, SR78812, SR78808,SR78810, SR78804 & SR78806 of 2014 N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.and P.VELMURUGAN, J. (Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN,J.) These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 1732 days in representing the above appeals. 2.Heard the parties. This Court is convinced with the reasons stated in the respective affidavits filed in support of the respective petitions to condone the delay of 1732 days in representing the above appeals and accordingly, these petitions are ordered. ay (N.K.K.,J.) (P.V.,J.) 20.02.2020 Note:Registry is directed to number the appeals if they are otherwise in order and post for admission. http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.P.Nos.3722, 3733, 3727, 3726, 3729, 3731, 3730 & 3734 of 2020 N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.andP.VELMURUGAN, J.ayC.M.P.Nos.3722, 3733, 3727, 3726,3729, 3731, 3730 & 3734 of 2020inT.C.A.Nos.SR78814,SR78802, SR78816, SR78812,SR78808, SR78810, SR78804 & SR78806 of 2014 C.M.P.Nos.3722, 3733, 3727, 3726, 3729, 3731, 3730 & 3734 of 2020 Dated:20.02.2020
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan