In Cmp/4211/2016 Of M/S Carmel Educational And v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: Having heard Mr.S.Sridhar, learned counsel for the appellant/ Assessee and Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent/Revenue and on being satisfied with the reasons stated in the Affidavit, filed in support of the Petition, we allow this Miscellaneous Petition and cond...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEANDC.SARAVANAN, J.
There is a delay of 37 days in filing the Appeal.
Having heard Mr.S.Sridhar, learned counsel for the appellant/ Assessee and Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent/Revenue and on being satisfied with the reasons stated in the Affidavit, filed in support of the Petition, we allow this Miscellaneous Petition and condone the delay of 37 days in filing the Appeal.
sra
(V.K.,ACJ.) (C.S.N., J.) 27.09.2019
Note to office:-
Registry is directed tonumber the Appeals andlist for Admission aftertwo weeks.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue