In Cmp/4324/2023 Of Arulmigu Devi Karumariamman v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
R.MAHADEVAN, J.ANDMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
This civil miscellaneous petition has
been filed by the petitioner seeking to condone the delay of 1265 days in filing the above tax case appeal.
2.Ms.V.Pushpa, learned Standing
Counsel takes notice for the respondent. She
submitted that she has no objection in allowing this petition seeking condonation of delay.
Having regard to the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition
and being satisfied with the same, the delay is condoned and this petition is accordingly ordered.
nsd
Note: The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue