Case LawHigh Court › Cmp/4416/2022 Of M/S Isallom India Priva...

Cmp/4416/2022 Of M/S Isallom India Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income -Tax Vi

High Court 17 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/4416/2022 Of M/S Isallom India Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income -Tax Vi
Date of order
17 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Cmp/4416/2022 Of M/S Isallom India Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income -Tax Vi, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

in TCA.SR.Nos.25295 & 25296 of 2022 R. MAHADEVAN, J. and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J. These petitions are filed by the petitioner / appellant seeking to accept the cause title in the above tax case appeals. 2.Heard Mr.N.V.Balaji, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/ appellant. 3.Mr. Karthik Ranganathan, learned senior standing counsel taking notice for the respondent/Revenue, has no objection for ordering these petitions, with a rider that such amendment shall not lead any improper claim by the petitioner/ appellant in the event of taxes being levied. 4. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner / appellant has agreed upon the aforesaid submission made by the respondent's counsel. 5. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, these petitions are ordered as prayed for. av [R.M.D., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 17.03.2022 C.M.P.Nos.4416 & 4418 of 2022 in TCA.SR.Nos.25295 & 25296 of 2022 R. MAHADEVAN, J. and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.av C.M.P.Nos.4416 & 4418 of 2022in TCA.SR.Nos.25295 & 25296 of 2022 17.03.2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan