Cmp/5423/2020 Of M/S.s 1911 A N Pudhur Paccs v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
09 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/5423/2020 Of M/S.s 1911 A N Pudhur Paccs v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Cmp/5423/2020 Of M/S.s 1911 A N Pudhur Paccs v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CMP.No.5423 & 5456 of 2020 in
T.C.A.Sr.Nos.123838 & 123839 of 2018
M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.,
AND
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.,
[Order of the Court was made byM.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.,]
Heard the submission of the learned
counsel appearing for the appellant and the
learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent / revenue has no serious objection in ordering these petitions.
2. This Court has also perused the affidavit filed in support of these Miscellaneous Petitions and having satisfied with the reasons stated, these miscellaneous petitions are ordered and the delay of 80 days in filing these appeals is condoned.
3. If the papers are otherwise in order,
Registry is directed to number the appeals and list it for admission and print the name of Ms.Pushpa, learned standing counsel for revenue.
sk
[M.S.N.J,] [A.Q.J.]
09.03.2020
http://www.judis.nic.in
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue