In Cmp/5858/2023 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 v. Regen Powertech P Ltd, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
R.MAHADEVAN, J.AND
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
These civil miscellaneous petitions have been filed by the petitioner seeking to condone the delay of 30 days in filing the above tax case appeals.
2. Though notice has been served on the respondent and its name has been printed in the cause list, there is no representation on its behalf either its representative or through an Advocate.
3.Having regard to the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions and being satisfied with the same, the delay is condoned and these petitions are accordingly ordered.
nsd
Note: The Registry is directed to number the appeals, if they are otherwise in order.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue