Case LawHigh Court › Cmp/6423/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Cmp/6423/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Gajaananda Jewellery

High Court 11 Aug 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/6423/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Gajaananda Jewellery
Date of order
11 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Cmp/6423/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Gajaananda Jewellery, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

C.M.P No.6423 of 2016inT.C.A.SR.No.3628 of 2016 S.MANIKUMAR, JANDD.KRISHNAKUMAR, J (Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.) Petition before us is filed to condone the delay of 108 days in filing Tax Case Appeals against the orde,r dated 27/2/2015, in ITA No.1646/Mds./2013, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai. 2. Mrs.R.Hemalatha, learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department, herself has sworn to the supporting affidavit to condone the delay of 108 days in filing the appeal, wherein, she has stated that the papers were handed over to her, on 13/8/2015 by Speed Post. Though Memorandum of Ground was made ready, due to heavy rain, and leakage of water in her office premises, papers were mixed up with other files and were located only during Christmas Holidays Vacation. Immediately, thereafter, appeal was filed on 12/1/2016. Thus, explaining the delay, of 108 days in filing the appeal, the deponent has submitted that the delay, was neither wilful nor wanton. S.MANIKUMAR, J AND D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J mvs. 3. Mr.V.Srinivasan, learned counsel for the respondent in the appeal, has no serious objection for condonation, but the Court may exercise the discretion. 4. Placing on record the above submission, when we advert to the reasons assigned, we are satisfied and the delay in filing the Tax Case Appeal, is condoned. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. [S.M.K.,J] [D.K.K., J] 11[th] August 2016 mvs. CMP No.6423 of 2016in TCA SR.No.3628 of 2016
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan