Case Law › High Court › Cmp/8326/2020 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Cmp/8326/2020 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Bidam Kawar

High Court 13 Aug 2020 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · hc_cis_mas

Parties

Date of order

13 Aug 2020

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Cmp/8326/2020 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Bidam Kawar, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: (Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH,J.) Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay of 228 days in representing the appeal is condoned and this petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

C.M.P.No.8326 of 2020 in TCA SR.No.151031 of 2019 C.M.P.No.8326 of 2020 in T.C.A. SR. No.151031 of 2019 M.M.SUNDRESH, J.ANDR.HEMALATHA, J. (Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH,J.) Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay of 228 days in representing the appeal is condoned and this petition is allowed. (M.M.S.J.) (R.H.J.)13.08.2020raa/kmk Page 1 of 1

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.