Case LawHigh Court › Cmp/8409/2023 Of C.krishnamurthy v. The...

Cmp/8409/2023 Of C.krishnamurthy v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 20 Oct 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/8409/2023 Of C.krishnamurthy v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
20 Oct 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Cmp/8409/2023 Of C.krishnamurthy v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C.M.P. No. 8409 of 2023 R.MAHADEVAN, J.ANDMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. (Order of the court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.) This Petition has been filed by the petitioner / appellant to condone the delay of 1452 days in representing the above tax case appeal. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the affidavit filed in support of this petition, wherein, it has been stated that the tax case appeal was filed on 31.07.2017 and the registry has returned the papers on 06.02.2020 for complying with certain defects. Due to Covid-19 pandemic, the petitioner was unable to approach the office of the Chartered Accountant and get the necessary documents. Subsequently, the petitioner was under financial crisis, due to business loss. Therefore, he was unable to re-present the papers within the time stipulated. Thus, according to the learned counsel, the delay of 1452 days occurred in re-presenting the appeal papers, is neither wilful nor wanton and the same may be condoned. 3.The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent has no serious objection. 4.Having regard to the reasons stated by the petitioner, which appear to be bona fide, considering the huge delay in re-presenting the appeal, the delay is condoned on condition that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- towards costs, to the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Madras, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. R.MAHADEVAN, J.ANDMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. ay 5.Upon production of receipt for payment of costs, this civil miscellaneous petition stands ordered. ay [R.M.D., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 20.10.2023 C.M.P. No. 8409 of 2023inT.C.A. SR. No. 37140 of 2017 in
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan