In Cmp/8415/2020 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-9 v. Pinky Jian, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Page 1 of 1 http://www.judis.nic.in C.M.P.No.8415 of 2020 in T.C.A.SR.No.151029 of 2018 C.M.P.No.8415 of 2020 in T.C.A.SR.No.151029 of 2018 M.M.SUNDRESH.,J andR.HEMALATHA.,J (Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH.,J) Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the petit...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Page 1 of 1
http://www.judis.nic.in
C.M.P.No.8415 of 2020 in T.C.A.SR.No.151029 of 2018
C.M.P.No.8415 of 2020 in T.C.A.SR.No.151029 of 2018
M.M.SUNDRESH.,J
andR.HEMALATHA.,J
(Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH.,J)
Considering the averments
made in the affidavit filed in
support of the petition, the delay of
229 days in representing the
appeal is condoned and this petition is allowed.
(M.M.S., J.) (R.H., J.) 14.08.2020
mmi/ssm
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue