Case LawHigh Court › Cmp/8997/2021 Of Principal Commissioner...

Cmp/8997/2021 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S.gmac Financial Services India Ltd

High Court 19 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/8997/2021 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S.gmac Financial Services India Ltd
Date of order
19 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
2007-2008
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Cmp/8997/2021 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S.gmac Financial Services India Ltd, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

CMP.No.8997 of 2021 in TCA.216/2017 C.M.P. No.8997 of 2021 in TCA.No.216 of 2017 R.MAHADEVAN, J, &MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. By order dated 17.02.2021, this Court, taking note of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant / Revenue that the tax effect in this appeal was less than the threshold limit fixed in the Circular No.17/2019, dated 08.08.2019 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes, has dismissed the aforesaid appeal viz., T.C.A.No.216 of 2017 with liberty to the appellant / Revenue to restore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits, in the event of the tax effect being above the threshold limit fixed in the said Circular. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner /appellant/ Revenue, who submitted that as per the records, the tax effect in this appeal relating to the assessment year 2007-2008 is Rs.2,03,20,205/- which is above the threshold limit. Therefore, in exercise of the liberty granted to the appellant, the learned counsel prayed that the appeal may be restored 1/3 CMP.No.8997 of 2021 in TCA.216/2017 on the file of this Court. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee has no objection for restoration of the appeal. 4.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and also considering the fact that the appellant has already been granted liberty at the time of dismissal of the appeal, this petition is ordered as prayed for. Consequently, T.C.A.No.216 of 2017 is restored to file. msr [R.M.D.,J.] [M.S.Q.,J.] 19.07.2022 2/3https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP.No.8997 of 2021 in TCA.216/2017 R.MAHADEVAN, J, &MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.msr C.M.P. No.8997 of 2021in TCA.No.216 of 2017 19.07.2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan