Cmp/9002/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.a.p.madanmohan
High Court
06 Jun 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Cmp/9002/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.a.p.madanmohan
Date of order
06 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Cmp/9002/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.a.p.madanmohan, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CMP.Nos.9002 and 9003 of 2022 in TCA.SR.Nos.74602 and 74608 of 2017
CMP.Nos.9002 and 9003 of 2022
in
TCA.SR.Nos.74602 and 74608 of 2017
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
and
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
These petitions are filed by the petitioner / appellant seeking to condone the delay of 1668 days in representing the above Tax Case Appeals.
2.Heard Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned standing counsel appearing for the petitioner/ appellant. It is submitted that the tax effect in these cases is less than the threshold limit and hence, the delay may be condoned and these cases may be directed to be listed for withdrawal on account of low tax effect.
3. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions made by the learned standing counsel for the petitioner, the delay is condoned and these petitions are ordered accordingly.
[R.M.D., J.] [M.S.Q., J.]
06.06.2022
av
Note :Registry is directed to number the appeals and post the same after a weekfor admission.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue