Cmp(Md)/10435/2024 Of Kannan Balamurugan v. Income Tax Department
High Court
10 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Cmp(Md)/10435/2024 Of Kannan Balamurugan v. Income Tax Department
Date of order
10 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Cmp(Md)/10435/2024 Of Kannan Balamurugan v. Income Tax Department, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
C.M.P.(MD)No.10435 of 2024in
W.A.(MD)No.SR41025 of 2024
C.M.P.(MD)No.10435 of 2024
DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.
ANDC.KUMARAPPAN, J.
(Order of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.)
Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents does not object for condonation of delay of 19 days in filing the writ appeal.
2. Hence and for the reasons set out in the accompanying affidavit, the
delay of 19 days in filing the writ appeal is condoned and this civil miscellaneous petition is ordered.
3. Let the writ appeal be numbered if it is otherwise in order and be listed for admission in due course.
4. Let the names of the learned counsel, who have entered appearance for the parties be continued in the list, as and when the matter is listed.
sm
[A.S.M.J.,] & [C.K.J.,] 10.09.2025
C.M.P.(MD)No.10435 of 2024
DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.ANDC.KUMARAPPAN, J.
sm
C.M.P.(MD)No.10435 of 2024inW.A.(MD)No.SR41025 of 2024
10.09.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue