C.nedumudikkilli v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-18
High Court
27 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
C.nedumudikkilli v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-18
Date of order
27 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In C.nedumudikkilli v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-18, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W.P.No.32855 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED :27.02.2025
Coram
The Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
W.P.No.32855 of 2023
and
W.M.P.Nos.32488 & 32489 of 2025
C.Nedumudikkilli
...Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-18
New Building, New No.46, Old No.108, III Floor, Room No.303, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
Chennai – 600 034.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Central Circle 1 (1)
Room No.320, Investigation Wing,
No.46, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam,
Chennai – 600 034.
...Respondent
Prayer :-
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records on the file of the respondent No.1 relating to the impugned order dated 28.06.2022 and to quash the same inasmuch as with respect to the assessment years 2002-2003, 2003-2004 and 2004 and 2005 and consequently, to direct the respondents to return/refund the seized amount of Rs.61,05,495/- along with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. to the petitioner.
For Petitioner: Mr.T.Sai Krishnan for Mr.S.Kishore Kumar For Respondents : Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, Junior Standing Counsel
1/4
W.P.No.32855 of 2023
Order
Heard Mr.T.Sai Krishnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, learned Junior Standing Counsel for respondents
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has sought for a larger relief, (viz., seeking to quash the impugned order) suffice it would be, if this Court issues a direction, permitting the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority, so that the petitioner would be able to establish his case before the Appellate Authority.
3. The learned Junior Standing Counsel for the respondents fairly submitted that since the petitioner has confined the prayer, and only seeks permission of this Court to avail the Appeal remedy, this Court may pass orders, as it deems fit.
4.Considering the fact that the petitioner has now restricted their
2/4
W.P.No.32855 of 2023
prayer and sought for a direction permitting them to file Appeal before the
Appellate Authority, this Court is inclined to pass/issue the following orders/directions:-
i) The petitioner is permitted to approach the Appellate Authority by way of Appeal as against the order, which is impugned herein within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the same shall be entertained by the Appellate Authority, without raising any ground on limitation aspect and disposed of in accordance with law
5.The Writ Petition is dismissed with liberty, as stated supra. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
27.02.2025
sd
Index : yes/no
To
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-18 New Building, New No.46, Old No.108, III Floor, Room No.303, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai – 600 034. New Building, New No.46, Old No.108, III Floor, Room No.303, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai – 600 034.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Central Circle 1 (1)
3/4
W.P.No.32855 of 2023
Room No.320, Investigation Wing, No.46, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
Krishnan Ramasamy,J.,
sd
W.P.No.32855 of 2023
27.02.2025
4/4
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.