Co. (I) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
11 Apr 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Co. (I) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
11 Apr 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Co. (I) Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: Reference is disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE.
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO. 903 OF 1998.
International General Electric
Co. (I) Ltd. ..Applicant.
vs.
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Bombay City-I. ..Respondent.
Shri Pankaj Kapoor for the applicant.
Shri A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 11-4-2005.
DATED: 11-4-2005.
DATED: 11-4-2005.
P.C.
1. The question raised in this reference is
already answered by the Division Bench of this Court
in the case of Lutrizol India Ltd. vs. Commissioner
of Income tax, (1991) 187 ITR 25 (Bom.), in favour of
the Revenue and against the assessee. In this view of
the matter, reference is answered in the negative.
Reference is disposed of with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
********
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue