Co-Op. Soc. Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of
High Court
14 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Co-Op. Soc. Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of
Date of order
14 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
1992-1993
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Co-Op. Soc. Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: 4) With the above clarification, appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 598 OF 2004
Maker Towers ‘E’ Premises .... Appellant
Co-op. Soc. Ltd.
Vs.
The Assistant Commissioner of .... Respondents
Income Tax, Circle 13(3),Mumbai
Mr. H. Toor i/b Crawford Bayley & Co. for the
Appellant.
Mr. Ashok Kotangale for Respondents.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, &
. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ
DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2007
P.C.
1) In so far this subject matter, order dated
13th January 2004, we find that the learned Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal in para no. 3 has restored
the matter back to the file of Assessing Officer to
decide the same afresh for reasons set out therein.
2) On behalf of the appellant, learned counsel
points out that assessment year 1992-1993,
1993-1994 the point which was raised by the
Appellant in this appeal has been held in favour of
the assessee.
2
3) It is open to the appellant to point out to
the learned Assessing Officer the order passed by
the Tribunal for the assessment year 1992-1993 and
1993-1994.
4) With the above clarification, appeal is
disposed of.
( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.