Comaiissioner Of Income Tax,Raipur (Cg v. M/Scarolbarterpvt.ltd.,Dhilloncomplex,Bhilai(C.g
High Court
02 Dec 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Comaiissioner Of Income Tax,Raipur (Cg v. M/Scarolbarterpvt.ltd.,Dhilloncomplex,Bhilai(C.g
Date of order
02 Dec 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Comaiissioner Of Income Tax,Raipur (Cg v. M/Scarolbarterpvt.ltd.,Dhilloncomplex,Bhilai(C.g, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
•^~-"-r.' -
•.'1.-..^. ..,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
[.C.C. N0.A5J_Y2013
(Arising out of order 20/04/2012 passed by Hqn'ble DivisibnBenchwheTeSy theTaxc[-no:]18/2012wastreatedasdismissed in the light of the pre-emptiy order mentionedabove.l
Comaiissioner Of Income Tax,Raipur (CG)
APPLICANT
VERSUS
M/sCarolBarterPvt.Ltd.,DhillonComplex,Bhilai(C.G.)
RESPONDENT
l^Ltd.,DhillonComplex,Bhilai0'5(C.G.)presente<sbySSK:--Oats^PpL'fcATION FORWHICH WAS TREATED AS DISMISSED IN UGHT OF THE
•M
V:
-^ ^ ./y
-?-
0V.Sfl^cb Srf^cRRTcf?T ^8H f ^f5 sj-gi'-l ^ ^cRT M^UIWs^T- <\C/^oc)^ ^ctii^fd.4 5RT sRTT^ 1^ cbP|4l" c|?r 3(6T ^ cf5?feTTtlWs^T- <\C/^oc)^ ^ctii^fd.4 5RT sRTT^ 1^ cbP|4l" c|?r 3(6T ^ cf5?feTTtl
o1.SI^cT,3n^t?c|? q^- cpT ^ ff^T 3T1^T-q^ g^arfcn-^NiR ^zrr ^nm ti ^tT TR^UT ^f qTRrr 3n^?r R-iTch-?o.o^.^oi? cnro' 'f^rr yfRrr t ?WT ^ ^r TicR"r wsirr-l^/^ol^ 3;T^TfftntoT^nUTtl cb|i|fd<4, ^RT 4i|4c||^ c[5^|
o^.zr?ISrfSterczragR TIWT vj^rbi^i^Pi'wiRd ^n^nm?i
Sd/-Manindra Mohan ShrivastavaJudge
Sd/-ChiefJustice
•if--
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.