In Commercial Ahmedabad Mills Co Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (1997) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 186 of 1983
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA.
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
--------------------------------------------------------------
COMMERCIAL AHMEDABAD MILLS CO LTD
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
SERVED for Petitioner
MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and
� MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA.
Date of decision: 09/01/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per Rajesh Balia, J)
1.�Statement of case has been submitted referring the question of law arising out of its appellate order by the Tribunal at the instance of the assessee. Inspite of service of notice, no one has appeared nor paper books
have been submitted. None is present when the matter is called out. In the circumstances, we decline to answer the questions referred to us and return the reference unanswered.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.