Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Income Tax, Dehradun And An...

Commissioner Income Tax, Dehradun And Another v. M/S R & B Falcon (A) Pvt. Ltd

High Court 28 Feb 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Commissioner Income Tax, Dehradun And Another v. M/S R & B Falcon (A) Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
28 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Income Tax, Dehradun And Another v. M/S R & B Falcon (A) Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Income Tax Appeal No. 24 of 2008 Commissioner Income Tax, Dehradun and another ………….. Appellants Versus M/s R & B Falcon (A) Pvt. Ltd., C/o Nangia and Company, 75/7, Rajpur Road, Dehradun. .…………. Respondent Present: Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate for the appellants. M[r. S.K. Posti, Advocate for the respondent. ] Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J.Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (Oral) The question raised in the present appeal, namely, whether total reimbursement of mobilization expenses is part of gross receipt for computation of income under Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has been answered in favour of the appellants by a Division of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax and another versus Halliburton Offshore Services Inc., reported in [2008] 300 ITR 265. Following the ratio of the judgment rendered in the said decision of this Court, we also answer the question in favour of the appellants and against the respondent. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. (Alok Singh, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 28.02.2013 28.02.2013 P. Singh
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan