Commissioner Of Income [Ax-Il, Cnanaigarn v. M/S Assam Lea House

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAl CHANDIGARH ITA No.331 of 2013 (O & M)Date of Decision:-29.02.2016 Commissioner of Income [ax-il, Cnanaigarn ..Appellant Versus M/s Assam lea House ... Responden ,CORAM:HONBLE MR, JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHONBLE MR, JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see Judgment?2. To be referred to reporters or not?3. Whether the Judgment snould be reported in the Digest? Present:-Mr. Urvasni Dnugga, Advocatefor the appellant. Ms. Radhika Suri, Sr. Advocate withMs. Rinku Daniya, Aavocate for the respondent, AJAY KUMAR MITTAL J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a communicationdated 8.2.2016 received from the office of the appellant. Same is taken on record. Copy of the same has been supplied to the counsel opposite. D Learned counsel for the appellant states that since the taxeffect Involved Is 414,74,/71/-, she has instructions to withdraw thepresent appeal in view of the circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015issued by the C.B.D.T., New Delhi. However, she prayed that liberty be granted to the revenue to file an application for revival of the appeal incase sometning survives therein. 3)Dismissed as withdrawn witn liberty as prayed for. It Is,however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall notbe taken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, thelegal issue as claimed by the revenue Is being left open to be adjudicatedin an appropriate case, (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL )JUDGE February 29, 2016Vijay Asija (HARI PAL VERMA) JUDGE