Commissioner Of Income (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Mbd Printographics (P) Ltd., Jalandhar
High Court
11 Jan 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Commissioner Of Income (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Mbd Printographics (P) Ltd., Jalandhar
Date of order
11 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income (Central), Ludhiana v. M/S Mbd Printographics (P) Ltd., Jalandhar, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 121 of 2013
Date of Decision: 11.1.2017
Commissioner of Income (Central), Ludhiana
....Appellant.
Versus
M/s MBD Printographics (P) Ltd., Jalandhar
...Respondent.
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN.
PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Pankaj Jain, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate and Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocate for the respondent.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
For orders, see ITA No. 122 of 2013 [Commissioner of
Income (Central), Ludhiana v. M/s MBD Printographics (P) Ltd.,
Jalandhar].
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
January 11, 2017gbs
(RAMENDRA JAIN)JUDGE
Whether Speaking/Reasoned
Whether Reportable
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.