Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Kolhapur 4...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Kolhapur 416 003 v. M/S Latif Farms, Sangli

High Court 26 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Kolhapur 416 003 v. M/S Latif Farms, Sangli
Date of order
26 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Kolhapur 416 003 v. M/S Latif Farms, Sangli, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.Accordingly, both the Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3051 OF 2009AND INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3052 OF 2009 Commissioner of Income Tax-1,Kolhapur 416 003 v/sM/s Latif Farms, Sangli … Appellant … Respondent Mr Suresh Kumar for Appellant. None for Respondent. CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA AND B.P. COLABAWALLA JJ. DATE : 26[th] FEBRUARY, 2016 P.C.:- 1.These two Appeals relate to Assessment Years 1997-98 and 1998-99. Mr Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the Revenue states that the tax effect in both the Appeals as indicated in para 10 of the Appeal Memos is Rs.4.96 and Rs.2.02 lakhs. He further states that in view of the Central Board of Direct Tax Circular No.21/15 dated 10[th] December 2015, the tax effect being less than the threshold limit of Rs.20 lakhs provided therein for challenging an order of the Tribunal before this Court, he does not press both the Appeals as it is not hit by clause 5 of the above Circular No.21 of 2015 dated 10[th ]December 2015. 2.Accordingly, both the Appeals are dismissed as not pressed. Refund of Court fees as per Rules. (B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan