Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax,-1 v. M/S Pra...

Commissioner Of Income Tax,-1 v. M/S Prashant Packaging Pvt. Ltd., 1 Ghagha Ghat Lane, Mahendru

High Court 04 Jul 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax,-1 v. M/S Prashant Packaging Pvt. Ltd., 1 Ghagha Ghat Lane, Mahendru
Date of order
04 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax,-1 v. M/S Prashant Packaging Pvt. Ltd., 1 Ghagha Ghat Lane, Mahendru, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

404-07-2023 Anushka/- U IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.326 of 2017 ====================================================== Commissioner Of Income Tax,-1 ... ... Appellant/s Versus M/s Prashant Packaging Pvt. Ltd., 1 Ghagha Ghat Lane, Mahendru ... ... Respondent/s ======================================================Appearance :For the Appellant/s: Mrs. Archana Sinha, AdvocateFor the Respondent/s: Mr. Ajay Kumar Rastogi, Advocate====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHYORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) The Government of India, Ministry of Financebrought out a Circular dated 08.08.2019, wherein the litigation policy is insofar as, not filing an appeal before the High Courtwhere the monetary stake is less than one crore rupees. Thisapplies squarely in the above case. The monetary limit of the litigation policy having notbeen exceeded, we are of the opinion that the appeal has to beclosed, but however, leaving the question of law open. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan