Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S. Yat...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S. Yatish Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd

High Court 01 Mar 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S. Yatish Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
01 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S. Yatish Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1132 OF 2012 Commissioner of Income Tax-1. v.M/s. Yatish Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr. Nishant Thakkar i/by Mint & Confreres for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M .S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 1st March, 2013 PC: In this appeal by the revenue for assessment year 2007- 08 following question of law has been raised for our consideration Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was justified in treating the difference between the purchase price of shares and the market value of shares, as on date of conversion of shares from stock in trade to investments as “business Income” and difference between sale price of share and market value of shares, as on date of conversion as “Capital Gains”? 2)Counsel for the parties state that an identical question was raised by the revenue in respect of the same respondent assessee in Income Tax Appeal No.1007 of 2011. This Court by order dated 28/1/2013 did not entertain the appeal filed by the revenue. For the reasons stated in our order dated 28/1/20913 in Income Tax Appeal No.1007 of 20211 we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. 3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan