Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1 v. M/S.tower Insurance & Reinsurance
High Court
20 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1 v. M/S.tower Insurance & Reinsurance
Date of order
20 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1 v. M/S.tower Insurance & Reinsurance, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1356 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.525 OF 2007
Commissioner of Income-tax-1 ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Tower Insurance & Reinsurance
Services India (P) Ltd., ..Respondent
----
Mr.A.S.Rao & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 20.02.2008
PC
1. This is a motion for condoning 998 days delay in
filing of the aforesaid appeal. On perusal of the
affidavit-in-support, we find that the A.O.
recommended filing of the appeal on 26.6.2004 and
the appeal ultimately came to be lodged on 2.3.2007.
The dates relating to events which occurred between
the aforesaid period have not been mentioned in the
affidavit-in-support. In our view, therefore, the
cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause.
Hence motion dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.525 OF 2007
. As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue