In Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Rakesh Prasad Singh, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.159 of 2010
======================================================
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
RAKESH PRASAD SINGH
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================Appearance :For the Petitioner/s: Mrs. ARCHNA SINHA, AdvocateFor the Respondent/s:======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAYORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
710-01-2018 While restoring M.A. No. 533 of 2004 on 06.09.2017 the
date of the peremptory order has been indicated as 18.12.2009.
This is an error. The date of the permptory order is 11.12.2009.
The aforesaid correction be read into the order dated06.09.2017.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
P.K.P./-
U
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue