Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1 v. R.s.mohi...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1 v. R.s.mohite,Jj

High Court 20 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

20 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1 v. R.s.mohite,Jj, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, Appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1497 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.526 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income-tax-1 ..Appellant Versus M/s.Uni Abaex Alloy Products Ltd.,,.Respondents ---- Mr.A.S.Rao & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.K.Shivram i/by KSA Legal for the respondents. Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 20.02.2008 PC 1. This is a Notice of Motion for codoning 626 days delay in filing of the aforesaid appeal. On perusal of the affidavit-in-support, we find that the CCIT accorded his sanction to file appeal on 14.6.2005. The last date for filing appeal was 15.6.2005. The appeal was actually lodged for filing on 2.3.2007. No dates have been given in respect of the events which occurred between 14.6.2005 and 2.3.2007. In our view, therefore, cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause and consequently, Motion stands dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.526 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.526 OF 2007 . As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, Appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.