Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. M/S.sahney Kirkwood Private Limited
High Court
10 Jan 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. M/S.sahney Kirkwood Private Limited
Date of order
10 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. M/S.sahney Kirkwood Private Limited, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2646 OF 2012
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1225 OF 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai
Versus
M/s.Sahney Kirkwood Private Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Arvind Pinto for the appellant.Mr.R Murlidhar i/by Rajesh Shah & Co., for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ.
DATE : 10[th] January 2013
P.C. :
1.By consent, the delay of 25 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(M.S. Sanklecha, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue