Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. M/S.strides Acrolab Limited
High Court
17 Jan 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. M/S.strides Acrolab Limited
Date of order
17 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. M/S.strides Acrolab Limited, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2240 OF 2010
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1338 OF 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Strides Acrolab Limited
..Respondent.
Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 17[th] January, 2011.
1.Heard. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, the delay is condoned. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue