Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Shri Habil Khorikwala, Worli, Mumbai – 400 025
High Court
31 Mar 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Shri Habil Khorikwala, Worli, Mumbai – 400 025
Date of order
31 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Shri Habil Khorikwala, Worli, Mumbai – 400 025, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The Review Petition and the Notice of Motion are accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.107 OF 2009
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.4244 OF 2009
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2076 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax – 10, MumbaiVersus
Shri Habil Khorikwala, Worli, Mumbai – 400 025
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
None for the appellant.None for the respondent.
P.C. :
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ. DATE : 31[st] March 2012
1.None appeared on behalf of the appellant, when the matter is called out. The Review Petition and the Notice of Motion are accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. No costs.
(A.R. Joshi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue