Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. M/S. Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd
High Court
14 Dec 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. M/S. Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd
Date of order
14 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. M/S. Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3133 OF 2011
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3415 OF 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax-10
..Appellant.
Vs.
M/s. Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd.
..Respondent.
....
Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant.Mr. Rajiv Singh, for the Respondent.
....
CORAM : J. P. DEVADHAR &
A.R. JOSHI, JJ. th DECEMBER, 2011.
DATED : 14
P.C.
1.This Notice of Motion is taken out seeking condonation of delay of 192 days in filing the Appeal. Counsel for the respondent vehemently opposes the Notice of Motion.
2.In our opinion, the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion constitute sufficient cause for condoning the delay. Accordingly the delay is condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute in the above terms.
(A. R. JOSHI, J.)
(J. P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue