Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax – 10Mumbai v....

Commissioner Of Income-Tax – 10Mumbai v. M/S. Indian Oiltanking Ltd

High Court 06 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax – 10Mumbai v. M/S. Indian Oiltanking Ltd
Date of order
06 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax – 10Mumbai v. M/S. Indian Oiltanking Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

dmt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 541 OF 2011IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1004 OF 2010 Commissioner of Income-Tax – 10Mumbai. Vs. M/s. Indian Oiltanking Ltd., ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. P.C. DATE : 6TH JULY, 2011. 1.By consent, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer (a). ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan