Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 v. M/S. C.c. Chokshi & Co. In Income
High Court
20 Oct 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 v. M/S. C.c. Chokshi & Co. In Income
Date of order
20 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 v. M/S. C.c. Chokshi & Co. In Income, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
k
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6879 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax -11, MumbaiVs.
.. Appellant
M/s. P.C. Hansotia & Co... Respondent.
Ms. S.V. Bharucha for the appellant.Mr. P.J. Pardiwala, Senior Counsel with Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 20TH OCTOBER, 2011.
P.C.
Counsel for the parties state that the question raised in this Appeal is
covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of the
Commissioner of Income Tax-11 vs. M/s. C.C. Chokshi & Co. in Income
Tax Appeal No. 209 of 2008 and Income Tax Appeal no. 193 of 2008 dated 25[th] July, 2008.
For the reasons stated therein, the present Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue