Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 Mumbai v....

Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 Mumbai v. Kavindra Gupta

High Court 01 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 Mumbai v. Kavindra Gupta
Date of order
01 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 Mumbai v. Kavindra Gupta, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION 2160/2010 INI.T.X.A. 6638/2010 Commissioner of Income Tax-12 MumbaiVs.Kavindra Gupta Appellant Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for AppellantMr.S.G.Dalal for Res. CORAM- J.P.DEVADHAR ,AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ.DATE -1[st] March,2011P.C. .By consent the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause ‘a’ . The Notice of Motion is disposed of. No costs. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan