Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. M/S.mittal Court Premises Co-Op. Society Limited
High Court
22 Mar 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. M/S.mittal Court Premises Co-Op. Society Limited
Date of order
22 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. M/S.mittal Court Premises Co-Op. Society Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5772 OF 2010
Commissioner of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Mittal Court Premises Co-op. Society Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Shivsharan for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 22[nd] March, 2011.
1.Heard. Admit on the following substantial questions of law.
a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal erred in holding that transfer charges received from the transferor / transferee in excess of alleged limits is covered by the principle of mutuality and is not chargeable to tax ?
b)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal erred in holding that the assessment made consequent to the notice issued is invalid ?
2.Counsel for the parties state that the question (a) is covered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee by the decision of this
Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Mittal Tower Premises Cooperative Society Limited reported in 320 ITR 414 (Bom.).
3.As regards question (b) is concerned, Counsel for the Revenue states that re-opening of assessment is held to be bad-in-law by this Court in
Writ Petition No.526 of 1996 decided on 17-07-2009.
4.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.