Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. M/S.siddhivinayak Crane Services
High Court
14 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. M/S.siddhivinayak Crane Services
Date of order
14 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. M/S.siddhivinayak Crane Services, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.322 OF 2008
Commissioner of Income Tax-13.
...Appellant
vs.
M/s.Siddhivinayak Crane Services...Respondent.
---
Ms.Anamika Malhotra, for Appellant.Mr.J.R.Shah with Ms.Pallavi Divekar, for Respondent.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: 14[th] August, 2008.
P.C.:-
1.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for boththe sides. The view taken by the tribunal that the
rent which was paid in advance for five years couldnot have been taken as expenditure made in oneyear,is a right view. We see no reason to interferewith it. The appeal is rejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue