Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-14, Kolkata v...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-14, Kolkata v. Ramesh Chand Gupta

High Court 07 Dec 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-14, Kolkata v. Ramesh Chand Gupta
Date of order
07 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-14, Kolkata v. Ramesh Chand Gupta, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and the substantial questions of law are left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

OD-5 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income tax) ORIGINAL SIDE ITA 34 of 2020 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-14, KOLKATA Vs RAMESH CHAND GUPTA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 7[th] December, 2021. Appearance: Mr. Sudarshan Lamba, Adv. …for the appellant. The Court : This appeal has been filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant has got written instructions given by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Headquarters-1, Kolkata dated 30.11.2021 informing the learned counsel that the respondent/assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and he has been requested to take necessary steps to withdraw this appeal. The said communication is placed on record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and the substantial questions of law are left open. (T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan