Commissioner Of Income Tax-15, Mumbai v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, K-Branch Mumbai & Anr
High Court
08 Jul 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-15, Mumbai v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, K-Branch Mumbai & Anr
Date of order
08 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-15, Mumbai v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, K-Branch Mumbai & Anr, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 4.In view of the above development, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous, but with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal against the final judgment of the Tribunal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1377 OF 2013
Commissioner of Income Tax-15, MumbaiVs.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, K-BranchMumbai & Anr.
..Petitioner
...Respondents
Mr. A.R. Malhotra for the petitioner.Mr. Rahul Hakani, for the respondent No.2.
P.C.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.DATE : 08 July 2013
Not on board. Mentioned at 11.00 a.m. Upon mentioning taken up on board.
2.This Writ Petition is directed against an interim order passed by the ITAT.
3.Learned counsel for the respondent assessee states that the ITAT has already disposed of the appeal by judgment dated 26 April 2013.
4.In view of the above development, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous, but with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal against the final judgment of the Tribunal.
CHIEF JUSTICE
M.S. SANKLECHA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue