Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 Mumbai v. Kalpana Dedhia
High Court
01 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 Mumbai v. Kalpana Dedhia
Date of order
01 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-17 Mumbai v. Kalpana Dedhia, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION 2162/2010
IN
I.T.X.A. 5257/2010
Commissioner of Income Tax-17 MumbaiAppellantVs.Kalpana Dedhia Respondent
Ms.Padma Divakar for AppellantNone for Res.
P.C.
CORAM- J.P.DEVADHAR ,AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ.DATE -1[st] March,2011
.None for the respondent though served.
For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, delay of 42 days is condoned. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause ‘a’ .
The Notice of Motion is disposed of. No costs.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue