Commissioner Of Income Tax – 17 … v. M/S. Dawn India …
High Court
01 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax – 17 … v. M/S. Dawn India …
Date of order
01 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
2007-2008
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax – 17 … v. M/S. Dawn India …, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.401 OF 2015
Commissioner of Income Tax – 17… Appellant Vs.M/s. Dawn India… Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.DATE : 1[st ] NOVEMBER, 2017
P.C.
1Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. He invited our attention to the question of law framed in paragraph 4 of the Appeal. The challenge in this Appeal is to the finding recorded by the Appellate Tribunal in paragraph 4.1 of the impugned judgment wherein the Appellate Tribunal has relied upon its own judgment in the case of the respondent for the Assessment Year 2007-2008. The said decision of the Tribunal was subjected to a challenge by the Appellant – Revenue by way of Income Tax Appeal No.1213 of 2014. By judgment and order dated 20th December, 2016 the Appeal has been dismissed. It is not in dispute that even in the present case, all payments made were in excess of Rs.50,000/-. Hence, no substantial question of law arises. The Appeal is dismissed.
(A.K. MENON, J)
(A.S. OKA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.