Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax-18 v. Mr.arun...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax-18 v. Mr.arun S.kaigaonkar

High Court 20 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax-18 v. Mr.arun S.kaigaonkar
Date of order
20 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax-18 v. Mr.arun S.kaigaonkar, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1575 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.756 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income-tax-18 ..Appellant Versus Mr.Arun S.Kaigaonkar ..Respondent ---- Mr.R.G.Bhat & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.P.J.Pardiwala with A.K.Jasani for respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 20.02.2008 PC 1. This is a motion for condoning 375 days delay in filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the affidavit-in-support, we find that the order of the Income-tax Tribunal was passed on 18.10.2005 and the case was sent to the concerned assessing officer on 19.12.2005. It was thereafter sent to CIT-18 on 2.11.2006. The delay caused during the period 19.12.2005 and 2.11.2006 has not been properly explained. In our view, cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence motion dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.756 OF 2007 . As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan