Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income-Tax-18 v. Sarojin...

Commissioner Of Income-Tax-18 v. Sarojini J.sanghavi

High Court 20 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income-Tax-18 v. Sarojini J.sanghavi
Date of order
20 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income-Tax-18 v. Sarojini J.sanghavi, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.898 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.513 OF 2007 Commissioner of Income-tax-18 ..Appellant Versus Sarojini J.Sanghavi ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.V.S.Hadade for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 20.02.2008 PC 1. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned. Office to register the appeal. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.513 OF 2007 1. Revenue has preferred this appeal on the following question of law :- "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal has erred in holding that the unexplained cash credit of Rs.50 Lacs in the name of M/s.Shubham Management & Credit Services P.Ltd., appearing in the books of accounts of the Assessee as on 31st March, 1996 was genuine taking into the account the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the Case of Sumati Dayal Vs. CIT in 214 ITR 801 (SC) ? : 2 : 2. There are two concurrent findings of fact. That being the case, question of law as framed would not arise and consequently, appeal dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan