Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Mrs.dadanbai B. Bachani
High Court
02 May 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Mrs.dadanbai B. Bachani
Date of order
02 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-19 v. Mrs.dadanbai B. Bachani, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2 / 2 904-ITXA-257-13.odt 3.In view of the above submission, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
1 / 2 904-ITXA-257-13.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.257 OF 2013
Commissioner of Income Tax-19
.... Appellant
versus
Mrs.Dadanbai B. Bachani... Respondent
…....
Mr.Sham Walve, Advocate for Appellant.Mr.Sham Walve, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr.B.V. Jhaveri, Advocate for Respondent.Mr.B.V. Jhaveri, Advocate for Respondent.
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.DATE: 02[nd] MAY, 2019.
P.C. :
1. This Appeal under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961 (“the Act” for short) has been filed challenging the
order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2.The learned Counsel appearing in support of theAppeal, states that he has been instructed to withdraw thisappeal. This is for the reason that the tax effect involved in thisappeal is less than the threshold limit of Rs.50 Lacs as providedin CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018.
2 / 2 904-ITXA-257-13.odt
3.In view of the above submission, the appeal is
dismissed as not pressed.
4.Refund of court fees as per rules.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue