Case Law › High Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Mumbai v. M...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Mumbai v. M/S Tata Motors Ltd

High Court 01 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

01 Mar 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 Mumbai v. M/S Tata Motors Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION 2121/2010INI.T.X.A.6210/2010WITHNOTICE OF MOTION 2122/2010 IN I.T.X.A. 6212/2010 Commissioner of Income Tax-2 MumbaiAppellantVs.M/s Tata Motors Ltd. Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for AppellantMr.Ajit Shah for respondent P.C. CORAM- J.P.DEVADHAR ,AND MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ.DATE -1[st] March,2011 .By consent both the Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause ‘a’ . Both the Notices of Motion are disposed of. No costs. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.