Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2 } v. A.a.sayed, J.) (S.c.dharmadhikari, J
High Court
19 Nov 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2 } v. A.a.sayed, J.) (S.c.dharmadhikari, J
Date of order
19 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax – 2 } v. A.a.sayed, J.) (S.c.dharmadhikari, J, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1283 OF 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax – 2}AppellantversusM/s. A. L. Movers Pvt. Ltd.}Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellants.
Ms. A. Vessanji i/b. Mr. S. J. Mehta for the Respondent.
CORAM :-S.C.DHARMADHIKARI &A.A.SAYED, JJ.DATED :-NOVEMBER 19, 2014
P.C. :-
Having heard Mr. Suresh Kumar and perusing the order of the Tribunal, particularly observations in paras 10 and 11 of the Tribunal's order, we do not think that the Appeal raises any substantial question of law. When the matter goes back to the Assessing Officer, he has to determine the question or issue before him afresh and in accordance with law. Meaning thereby, the applicable law including the case law. In these circumstances, we do not think that he would be bound by any specific observation made by the Tribunal or any Judgment referred to by the Tribunal. If that Judgment is reversed or set aside, the Assessing Officer is bound to apply the law prevailing. In these circumstances, this Appeal does not require any admission. It is dismissed.
(A.A.SAYED, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.