Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-22,Mumbai v....

Commissioner Of Income Tax-22,Mumbai v. M/S. Vinayak Sai Developers

High Court 06 Jan 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-22,Mumbai v. M/S. Vinayak Sai Developers
Date of order
06 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
2006-07, 2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-22,Mumbai v. M/S. Vinayak Sai Developers, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: DATED : 06 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in upholding the project completion method adopted by the assessee in determining the income from the project in the Assessment Year 2006-07, is the question raised in this Appeal.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.243 OF 2011 Commissioner of Income Tax-22,Mumbai. Vs. M/s. Vinayak Sai Developers. ..Appellant. ..Respondent. .... Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant. .... P.C. CORAM : J. P. DEVADHAR & A.R. JOSHI, JJ. th JANUARY, 2012. DATED : 06 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in upholding the project completion method adopted by the assessee in determining the income from the project in the Assessment Year 2006-07, is the question raised in this Appeal. 2.The Tribunal has recorded a finding of fact that on completion of the project in A.Y. 2007-08, the assessee computed the taxable income on the basis of the project completion method and the same has been accepted by the Revenue. 3.In these circumstances, the decision of the ITAT in holding that in the assessment year in question the assessee was justified in computing the total income from the project by following the project completion method, cannot be faulted. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. (A. R. JOSHI, J.) (J. P. DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan