Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax 23, Mumbai v....

Commissioner Of Income Tax 23, Mumbai v. M/S.mahajan Silk Mills

High Court 01 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax 23, Mumbai v. M/S.mahajan Silk Mills
Date of order
01 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax 23, Mumbai v. M/S.mahajan Silk Mills, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2383 OF 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax 23, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Mahajan Silk Mills..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent. P.C. : CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, JJ. DATE : 1[st] July, 2011. 1.In this case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has restored the issue to the file of the assessing officer for a fresh decision in the light of the Special Bench decision in the case of Topman Exports V/s. ITR [(2009) 318 ITR (AT) 87 (Mumbai) (SB)]. Since the Tribunal has restored the issue to the file of the assessing officer, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. However, the decision of the Special Bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of Topman Exports has been reversed by this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Kalpataru Colors and Chemicals reported in 328 ITR 451. 2.In this view of the matter, the assessing officer is directed to take into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Kalpataru Colors and Chemicals (supra) and pass a fresh order in accordance with law. 3.The appeal is accordingly disposed off with no order as to costs. (Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan