Commissioner Of Income Tax-24, Mumbai… v. Subhash Chand Mantri (Huf
High Court
19 Mar 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-24, Mumbai… v. Subhash Chand Mantri (Huf
Date of order
19 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Commissioner Of Income Tax-24, Mumbai… v. Subhash Chand Mantri (Huf, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bsb
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 394 OF 2012
Commissioner of Income Tax-24, Mumbai… Appellant
v/s
Subhash Chand Mantri (HUF)
… Respondent
Mr.Tejveer Singh for the appellant.Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED : 19TH MARCH, 2014
P. C. :
1Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. Perused the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Both authorities have concurrently held that the profit on sale of shares which were received as bonus shares can be taxed only under the head “capital gain”. The assessee was not found to be holding these shares for the purposes of his business. The assessee in this case was investing in the shares. Some of the shares invested were of a
company and which later on issued bonus shares. Those bonus shares have been sold. That income is directed to be taxed under the head “capital gains”. The findings are, therefore, essentially factual. They do not give rise to any substantial question of lawenabling us to entertain this appeal. The appeal is, therefore dismissed.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.