In Commissioner Of Income Tax-25… v. Not On Board. Mentioned. Taken On Board, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: Income Tax Appeal is disposed of aswithdrawn 3.Refund of Court fees as per rules.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
NIKITAYOGESHGADGILDigitally signed byNIKITA YOGESHGADGILDate: 2022.08.0617:02:23 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1710 OF 2013
Commissioner of Income Tax-25… Appellant
VersusRekha Khandelwal…Respondent
******
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Appellant.
******
CORAM: DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE : 5[th] AUGUST, 2022
P.C. :-
1.Not on Board. Mentioned. Taken on Board.
2.Learned counsel for the Appellant states seeks leave towithdraw the appeal as the tax effect is below the present limit set bythe CBDT. Leave Granted. Income Tax Appeal is disposed of aswithdrawn
3.Refund of Court fees as per rules.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR,J.)
Nikita Gadgil
1/1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue