Case LawHigh Court › Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Bank Of...

Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Bank Of America Securities

High Court 07 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Bank Of America Securities
Date of order
07 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Bank Of America Securities, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon'ble Tribunal was justified in deleting the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer of Rs.30,00,000/- being payment made by the Assessee company as entrance fees for membership of Bombay Gymkhana?the Hon'ble Tribunal was justifi...

Decision: In this view of the matter, the Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3892 OF 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax-3 ..Appellant. Vs. Bank of America Securities (India) Pvt Ltd..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta, for the Appellant. Mr. P.J.Pardiwala,Sr. Counsel with Vasanti B Patel for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 7TH JULY, 2011. P.C. Heard. Two questions of law are raised by the revenue in this appeal which read thus:- 1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon'ble Tribunal was justified in deleting the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer of Rs.30,00,000/- being payment made by the Assessee company as entrance fees for membership of Bombay Gymkhana?the Hon'ble Tribunal was justified in deleting the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer of Rs.30,00,000/- being payment made by the Assessee company as entrance fees for membership of Bombay Gymkhana? 2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon'ble Tribunal was justified in holding that the entrance fees paid for membership of a recreation/sports club is revenue expenditure?the Hon'ble Tribunal was justified in holding that the entrance fees paid for membership of a recreation/sports club is revenue expenditure? The aforesaid questions are answered against the revenue by the decision of this court in the case of Otis Elevator Co.(India) Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vol.195 ITR 682. In this view of the matter, the Appeal is dismissed. ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan